Fox News names some names - I missed this earlier.
http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/03/exclusive-unknown-doj-lawyers-identified/
For those who defend these al Qaeda lawyers because everyone deserves an advocate, let me bring up a couple lines of inquiry:
1. Were the members of the DoJ al Qaeda 10 paid for their services? If so, by whom? How were they assigned these cases by their law firm?
2. Were the members of the DoJ al Qaeda 10 doing work pro bono? If so, then they were doing the work for free because they personally believed that the al Qaeda terrorists are wrongfully detained and they disdain US action to keep Americans safe from these terrorists and further attack.
The first line of inquiry may provide members of the DoJ al Qaeda 10 a reasonable excuse that does not make them a prima facie objectionable attorney to serve in the Department of Justice.
Attorneys who worked without pay to free terrorists (who already had legal representation, by the way) should be treated as pariahs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment